Toxic Links: Insights from Google Executives & SEO Impact
By: Dileep Thekkethil | Updated On: June 21, 2024
Table of Contents
In a recent Google Webmaster Central Office Hours discussion, Google’s Gary Illyes addressed a pressing question about how to notify Google of potentially harmful or “toxic” links aimed at sabotaging a site’s backlink profile.
The issue of toxic backlinks has troubled webmasters and SEO professionals for over fifteen years, raising concerns about the possible negative impact on search engine rankings and whether they should disavow it via search console.
Ignore Toxic Links, Says Google
Gary Illyes, analyst at Google Search team, responded to the query: “How to alert Google of sabotage via toxic links?”
His advice was straightforward: “I’d ignore those links.”
He emphasized that Google’s algorithms are proficient at identifying and disregarding irrelevant or harmful links directed at a site.
However, he mentioned that if webmasters feel compelled, they could use Google’s disavow tool or file a spam report to mitigate their concerns.
Google’s Guidelines for Using the Disavow Tool Effectively
Illyes linked to Google’s detailed explanation about when to disavow links. Google defines the disavow as a feature primarily designed for site owners to inform them about problematic links they might be accountable for, such as paid links or those part of a link scheme.
Google advises using the disavow tool under specific conditions:
- Substantial Quantity of Spammy Links: There is a significant number of artificial or low-quality links pointing to the site.
- Manual Action Risk: These links have either caused a manual action or are likely to cause one.
These parameters show that disavowing links should be a deliberate action, reserved for situations in which the site’s backlink profile is severely at risk.
Historical Context
The term “toxic links” gained prominence post-2012, following Google’s Penguin updates, which targeted sites with manipulative link practices.
As Google enhanced its ability to penalize low-quality links, some individuals, especially in cutthroat industries like gambling, resorted to negative SEO tactics.
This involved generating low-quality links to sabotage competitors’ rankings. The SEO industry coined the term “toxic links” to describe these harmful backlinks and marketed disavowal services as a remedy.
Impact Analysis
Illyes’ reassurance indicates Google’s evolving sophistication in handling spammy links. The message he is trying to convey is clear: Google’s algorithms are adept at filtering out irrelevant or harmful backlinks, minimizing the need for webmasters to take action.
But the recent Google API leak documents clearly states that websites get penalized for bad backlinks. In the documentation, we see references to “BadBackLinks.”
As it reads, “Whether this doc is penalized by BadBackLinks, in which case we (Google) should not use improvanchor score in mustang ascroer”
This suggests that a page can be penalized for having “bad” backlinks.
As an agency with 14+ years of experience, we suggest website owners make use of the disavow tool if they see a sudden drop in rankings and also find a slew of toxic backlinks pointing to the site.
Executives Reiterate Google’s Capabilities
Illyes’ advice aligns with evidence Google executives have shared in the past on several SEO communities.
For instance, an incident from 2012 demonstrated Google’s proficiency in ignoring negative SEO efforts. A website owner feared that a barrage of harmful backlinks had caused their site to lose rankings.
However, Google executives confirmed that the drop in rankings was due to content-related issues, not the malicious links; a recommendation that Google executives are known to overuse.
There are many such instances wherein Google has tried to boast about its capabilities to fight toxic backlinks. But as website owners, when you have the control over the links that you want to keep and the ones that have to be removed, we recommend that you use the opportunity rather than hoping Google will ignore it.
John Mueller, another prominent Google spokesperson, on Reddit, had criticized the concept of “toxic links” as a construct by SEO tools for profit, advising against disavowing links unless a manual penalty is received.
Mueller emphasized that such actions often do more harm than good and hinted that Google might eventually eliminate the disavow link tool altogether, reinforcing the idea that SEOs should avoid relying on these services.
Implications and Predictions
Google’s stance on toxic links suggests a future where the focus will shift more towards quality content and user experience rather than backlink profile. However, the recent leaks continue to suggest that toxic backlinks can adversely affect websites.
As Google’s algorithms change day by day, the impact of negative SEO tactics will likely diminish, offering a more level playing field for all webmasters. But at this point in time, take the suggestions from Google executives about using the disavow tool with a pinch of salt.
Of course, over time there could come a time wherein the emphasis on link disavowal services can be reduced.
Practical Advice
For webmasters concerned about toxic links, Illyes’ guidance offers a clear course of action:
- Monitor Your Backlink Profile: Regularly review your backlinks using tools like Google Search Console to stay informed about your site’s link profile.
- Focus on Content Quality: Prioritize high-quality content and user experience to mitigate any minor impacts from irrelevant backlinks.
- Use Disavow Tool Wisely: Only resort to disavowing links if there is a substantial quantity of spammy links and a real risk of manual action from Google.
Key Takeaways
- Google’s algorithms are highly effective but the recent API document leak suggests that it penalizes websites with bad backlinks. Since the definition of bad backlinks is not made clear, we have to assume this includes the toxic ones as well.
- The disavow tool should be used after thoughtful reviewing of the domains that you add in the disavow list.
- The emphasis on content quality and user experience remains paramount in maintaining good search engine rankings.
- As Google’s capabilities in handling negative SEO improve, the SEO community can expect a more secure and fair environment.
Get Your Free SEO Audit Now!
Enter your website URL below to receive a comprehensive SEO report with tailored insights to boost your site's visibility and rankings.

You May Also Like
Google’s Image Search Faces Allegations of AI Image Suppression
SEO experts and digital publishers are raising concerns over a potential shift in Google’s Image Search algorithm, which may be suppressing AI-generated images. Recent reports from multiple website owners indicate significant drops in AI image traffic, sparking debates about whether Google is tweaking its ranking criteria to favor traditionally created visuals. A Mysterious Decline in … Google’s Image Search Faces Allegations of AI Image Suppression
Google’s Prefetching Tech: How Search Just Got Faster
Google has found a way to make search results load almost instantly. Using the Speculation Rules API, Chrome preloads top search results before users click, reducing wait times significantly. This means search pages appear faster, making browsing smoother and more efficient. Google is cutting down the delay between clicking a search result and seeing the … Google’s Prefetching Tech: How Search Just Got Faster
Google’s Tabbed Content Dilemma: Are You Losing SEO Rankings?
Website owners and digital marketers have long debated whether Google can effectively crawl and index tabbed content. Now, thanks to insights from John Mueller, we finally have some clarity—but it might not be what you expected. SEO expert Remy Sharp recently asked on Bluesky whether Google and other search engines could navigate JavaScript or CSS-based … Google’s Tabbed Content Dilemma: Are You Losing SEO Rankings?
Comments