Google’s Barry Pollard Reveals Vital Fixes for Website Speed Issues
By: Zulekha Nishad | Updated On: January 13, 2025
Table of Contents
Google Chrome’s Barry Pollard has explained ways to fix the Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) issues, a critical metric for website speed and SEO rankings.
In his latest insights, Pollard explains how poor server response times, hidden inefficiencies, and misguided debugging are often the culprits behind slow load times.
His solutions promise faster websites, better user experiences, and stronger search rankings—making this a must-read for every SEO professional.
I’ve had a few people reach out to me recently asking for help with LCP issues where they are looking at optimising the wrong thing. They were asking what frontend improvements they could make when that was not the problem.
Yup it’s time for another long thread to try to explain…
🧵 1/17
— Barry Pollard (@tunetheweb.com) January 9, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Why LCP Is a Critical Metric for Website Success
LCP measures how long it takes for the largest visible content (like an image or a block of text) to load in a user’s viewport. This isn’t just a number—it directly correlates with user experience and, more importantly, search engine rankings.
A sluggish LCP score signals delays that frustrate users and drive them away.
Pollard’s expert analysis dives into the root causes of poor LCP scores and lays out a clear path for optimizing them.
His approach moves beyond surface-level fixes, focusing instead on real-world data and repeatable testing strategies.
From Metrics to Action: Pollard’s Five-Step Formula
Here are Pollard’s expert strategies to diagnose and resolve website speed issues:
1. Understand the Data Before You Act
A common pitfall for SEOs is using the wrong tools to debug LCP issues.
Pollard emphasizes starting with PageSpeed Insights (PSI), which integrates real-world data from Chrome User Experience Reports (CrUX).
- URL-Level Data: Shows performance for specific pages.
- Origin-Level Data: Aggregates sitewide performance.
Both datasets can help identify whether issues are isolated to a page or symptomatic of broader problems.
PSI also provides contextual clues that make debugging more precise.
2. Diagnose Server Responsiveness With TTFB
Pollard zeroes in on Time to First Byte (TTFB), a key metric revealing how quickly a server responds to a user’s request. A slow TTFB could mean:
- Inefficient server performance.
- Complex or inefficient backend code.
- Database queries requiring optimization.
3. Validate Problems Using Lighthouse Lab Tests
To ensure reliability, Pollard recommends using Lighthouse lab tests alongside PSI metrics. These synthetic tests simulate user interactions and deliver repeatable results.
For instance, if PSI reports slow TTFB, running a Lighthouse lab test can confirm whether the issue is a fluke or genuinely tied to the server.
4. Spot Server Issues Hidden by CDNs
Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) like Cloudflare cache web pages in global data centers, speeding up delivery.
However, they can mask underlying server inefficiencies. Pollard offers two clever tricks to bypass CDN caching:
- Append a random parameter (e.g., ?XYZ) to the URL to test the uncached version.
- Test less frequently visited pages that aren’t cached in every location.
For identifying region-specific slowdowns, Pollard suggests tools like Treo.sh, which visualizes geographic TTFB performance.
5. Fix Only What Can Be Verified
Pollard underscores the importance of focusing on repeatable problems. If the issue isn’t consistent, it’s likely unrelated to LCP.
For repeatable problems, he offers practical solutions:
- Upgrade underpowered servers.
- Simplify or optimize backend code.
- Fine-tune database queries to reduce latency.
- Avoid unnecessary redirects, as each redirect can add 0.5 seconds to TTFB.
Why This Matters for Every SEO Professional
Google’s Core Web Vitals, including LCP, are non-negotiable in today’s SEO playbook.
A fast website doesn’t just improve rankings—it enhances user engagement, retention, and conversions.
Businesses ignoring LCP risk falling behind competitors who prioritize performance optimization.
Pollard’s advice is a wake-up call to organizations relying solely on front-end fixes.
True performance improvements require a deeper look at server configurations, CDN usage, and backend workflows.
How Core Web Vitals Changed the SEO Game
Introduced in 2020, Core Web Vitals redefined how Google evaluates website performance.
Metrics like LCP, First Input Delay (FID), and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) shifted the focus from traditional SEO strategies to user-centric design and development.
Among these metrics, LCP has proven the trickiest to master due to its reliance on server-side optimizations.
Pollard’s insights provide much-needed clarity in an area that’s been shrouded in confusion for years.
Predictions for Web Performance Metrics
Google’s commitment to improving web performance suggests that Core Web Vitals will only grow in importance.
Future updates may introduce new metrics or stricter thresholds for existing ones, further emphasizing speed and responsiveness.
For businesses, this means proactive optimization is essential. Investing in faster servers, efficient code, and robust CDNs now can safeguard against potential penalties in the future.
Practical Advice for Website Owners
If you’re ready to tackle LCP issues head-on, here’s a checklist based on Pollard’s guidance:
- Start with PSI for real-world performance insights.
- Prioritize TTFB optimization to address server-side delays.
- Use Lighthouse lab tests for consistent, repeatable debugging results.
- Test uncached versions of your site to identify hidden server problems.
- Avoid redirects and streamline backend workflows to eliminate unnecessary delays.
Key Takeaways
- LCP measures how quickly key content loads in a user’s viewport, directly impacting user experience and SEO.
- PSI’s TTFB data provides essential clues for diagnosing server-related issues.
- Lighthouse lab tests offer repeatable, synthetic results for debugging LCP problems.
- Bypassing CDN caches is crucial for uncovering masked server inefficiencies.
- Fixes should focus on verified, repeatable problems to ensure tangible improvements.
Get Your Free SEO Audit Now!
Enter your website URL below to receive a comprehensive SEO report with tailored insights to boost your site's visibility and rankings.

You May Also Like
Google’s Tabbed Content Dilemma: Are You Losing SEO Rankings?
Website owners and digital marketers have long debated whether Google can effectively crawl and index tabbed content. Now, thanks to insights from John Mueller, we finally have some clarity—but it might not be what you expected. SEO expert Remy Sharp recently asked on Bluesky whether Google and other search engines could navigate JavaScript or CSS-based … Google’s Tabbed Content Dilemma: Are You Losing SEO Rankings?
Google’s Review Count Bug Leaves Businesses Frustrated
A strange bug has been affecting Google reviews since Friday, February 7th, causing widespread panic among small businesses and local SEO professionals. Many businesses woke up to find some of their hard-earned reviews missing, while others noticed significant drops in their review count. But before assuming the worst, here’s what’s actually happening. What’s Happening … Google’s Review Count Bug Leaves Businesses Frustrated
The Future of AI: Who Gains and Who Loses in the Tech Boom?
AI is no longer some futuristic concept; it’s here, and it’s moving fast. But as exciting as this is, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has a big concern – not everyone is going to benefit equally. Some will ride the wave of AI into new opportunities, while others might find themselves left behind. Well, that’s a … The Future of AI: Who Gains and Who Loses in the Tech Boom?
Comments