Google Search Is Getting Worse, Says Mrwhosetheboss

In a video that has quickly gone viral with over 1.75 million views in just two days, British YouTuber Mrwhosetheboss (Arun Rupesh Maini) has sparked a debate over Google Search’s relevance and usability, pointing to a significant departure from the platform’s original commitment to quality and transparency. 

His video, “Why Google Search is Falling Apart,” explains how Google’s focus appears to have shifted from delivering user-centered results to maximizing ad revenue. This has sparked widespread discussion and drawn support from users and creators who share their frustrations.

In his 17-minute video, Maini dissects Google’s interface changes, highlighting the prevalence of ads that now dominate search results. What was once a streamlined user experience aimed at delivering information quickly is now layered with paid content that dilutes search quality. 

Maini shows that users frequently have to scroll past as many as four ads—each carefully designed to look like organic results—before finding authentic content. 

“Imagine if you clicked on one of my YouTube videos, and I chose to start with four sponsored ads before I even got into the content,” Maini says, pointing to the stark degradation in user experience and questioning Google’s commitment to relevance over revenue.

A Legacy of Transparency: Has Google Drifted from Its Mission?

When Google was founded, it set a new standard for online search by prioritizing relevance and impartiality. This commitment to quality was documented in the 1998 PageRank research paper, authored by Google’s founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin. 

They wrote, “advertising income often provides an incentive to provide poor quality search results,” underscoring their goal to create a search engine driven by transparency and academic rigor, not profit. Their vision propelled Google’s early success, earning it a reputation as the go-to for trustworthy, user-centered results.

Today, however, Maini argues that this initial vision has been compromised. Google’s financial figures reveal a heavy reliance on advertising revenue, with 76.3% of its $84.7 billion Q2 2024 revenue stemming from ads, 75% from Google Search alone. 

Maini’s critique questions whether Google can still honor Page and Brin’s vision of a “transparent and academic” search engine when so much of its income depends on paid placements that blur the line between organic and sponsored content. 

This shift has led to what many see as a steady erosion of Google’s original values, raising concerns about its commitment to user trust and relevance.

Ads Overload and the “Above the Fold” Issue

Maini focuses on “above the fold,” which originated in the newspaper industry and refers to the most visible part of a page. In its early years, Google ensured that the “above the fold” space was dedicated to providing fast, relevant answers.

But now, that space has become prime real estate for ads, making it increasingly difficult for users to distinguish between paid placements and genuine results.

For many users, the ad saturation is a frustration that goes beyond Google Search to other Google-owned platforms, like YouTube. 

Viewer comments on Maini’s video echo these sentiments. @tomasplunksnis1087 commented, “The only good thing about Google search is that it searches Reddit better than Reddit’s search when it comes to older posts.” 

Another viewer, @tronletham7077, wrote, “Google search has become so bad that I now add ‘Reddit’ in almost 80% of my queries just so I can get a more helpful answer.” 

These comments illustrate a shift in user behavior, with many relying on alternative sources, like Reddit, to find reliable information.

Similar issues extend to YouTube’s search function, where irrelevant shorts and “recommended” videos dominate. @alexandretherrien1234 highlighted this, stating, “These days it feels like you can’t search a topic without being bombarded with irrelevant shorts and ‘you might also like’ videos.” 

Both comments reflect a broader trend: users perceive Google’s search products as prioritizing engagement metrics and ad revenue over providing relevant and straightforward results.

The Ripple Effect on Quality Content Creators

Google’s focus on monetization over organic results is impacting quality content creators. Many small and mid-sized sites that produce genuine, user-focused content have been hit hard by Google’s recent algorithm changes, which, critics argue, appear to favor larger brands and paid placements. 

To address these growing concerns, Google has begun meeting with content creators to hear their frustrations directly. However, feedback indicates that these conversations haven’t led to substantial improvements in traffic for many sites.

Two notable examples are Retro Dodo and Hardbacon. Retro Dodo, a retro gaming review site created by Brandon Saltalamacchia, is a trusted source for niche gaming information. 

Despite publishing high-quality, authentic reviews, Retro Dodo has seen a drastic drop in traffic. From 529K organic traffic in September 2023, it declined to 34K in August 2024.

Saltalamacchia attended one of Google’s creator meetings, but the site reported only a temporary increase in traffic following Google’s August 2024 core update, after which the decline resumed.

Similarly, Hardbacon, a free budgeting app, experienced a staggering decline in visibility. Hardbacon once attracted over 357,000 monthly visitors, but as of September 2023, that number had fallen to under 80,000.

Like Retro Dodo, Hardbacon saw some brief improvement after the August 2024 update; its traffic again nosedived, underscoring the inconsistency of Google’s algorithm in determining quality sites. 

These cases represent a much larger issue: thousands of quality-driven content creators struggle to maintain their visibility and rankings despite Google’s outreach and reassurances.

Many creators and digital marketing professionals feel that Google’s algorithm changes inadvertently penalize genuine content. Despite Google’s recognition of their value signals, quality sites continue to struggle that algorithmic adjustments may not fully address the issues. 

According to Google Algorithm trackers, the ranking fluctuations have been at the peak for more than a month.

@CJStew06, a former digital marketing expert, captured this sentiment, commenting, “We had it so good with old Google, and we’ve strayed so far.”

 His reflection highlights how the evolution of SEO and digital advertising has shifted from enhancing visibility for quality content to catering to algorithmic loopholes and revenue streams.

AI and “Instant Answers”: Convenience vs. Accuracy

In addition to ad saturation, users and creators are growing wary of Google’s use of AI-generated “instant answers” as a substitute for reliable search results. 

These AI-generated summaries provide quick responses at the top of search results, yet they are often outdated or incorrect, further undermining user trust.

Many, like Maini, feel these summaries are misleading and undercut the creators whose content is being repurposed without direct attribution.

I did a quick search for the population of New York, and the result was strangely similar to the one that Maini got for the search for the world population.

Similarly, commenter @robinsternberg213 pointed out how this trend affected Google Lens, once known for its precision. “I used to be able to photograph a plant, a mineral, or whatever and get shown articles about the exact thing I was looking for. Nowadays… you want aquamarine?” 

This statement highlights how users increasingly perceive AI-driven answers as unreliable and overly generic, reducing the likelihood of finding targeted information.

Google Gemini, which was supposed to be Google’s answer to ChatGPT, has been on the receiving end since its launch last year. 

The haste launched to defend the criticism of not being as innovative as OpenAI forced Google to launch Bard (now Gemini) without proper beta testing, ending in a PR disaster. 

This trend to keep all information within the Google Ecosystem has troubling implications for content creators, whose work is often used to train Google’s AI without providing direct traffic or recognition. 

By keeping users within Google’s ecosystem, AI-generated answers reduce the need to click through to creator sites, diminishing their visibility and undermining the work they put into generating quality content. 

Many creators feel they are now competing against large websites and Google’s AI, which uses their content without offering an equitable exchange in visibility or revenue.

Shifts in User Trust: Is Google’s Future at Risk?

The response to Maini’s video reveals a growing disillusionment with Google’s commitment to its founding values.

Commenters like @nathangriffiths6218 note that users increasingly avoid Google for basic searches, preferring platforms like Facebook to crowdsource information from other users rather than rely on Google’s ad-heavy answers. 

Others, like @epidemicrage4337, pointed to similar issues on YouTube, stating, “YouTubers’ careers can be destroyed… while so many disgusting and fake mobile game ads that themselves violate YouTube guidelines are being bombarded onto users.” This underscores how Google’s ad-driven focus impacts user trust across multiple platforms.

Maini’s critique and the surge of viewer support point to a significant challenge for Google. While the company’s efforts to meet with creators and adjust its algorithm show a willingness to listen, the lack of sustained improvements suggests deeper issues. 

Maini and his viewers are calling for a return to Google’s original mission of delivering quality, user-first results—a mission that seems to be fading under the weight of ad saturation and algorithmic shortcuts.

The future of Google’s search model remains uncertain. While Google’s leadership may recognize the need for change, the company’s reliance on ad revenue poses a structural challenge. 

Maini’s video may have served as a wake-up call. Still, the question remains: can Google recalibrate to prioritize quality over monetization, or has it reached a point of no return? 

The answer will determine whether Google can regain user trust and restore the transparency Larry Page and Sergey Brin envisioned in their original PageRank research.