Toxic Links Aren’t Worth Disavowing, Says Mueller

In a recent exchange on the social platform Bluesky, John Mueller dismissed the common SEO practice of disavowing “toxic” links, calling it a “billable waste of time.” 

This statement has sparked debate within the SEO community, where the use of tools that flag so-called toxic links remains a widely promoted practice.

Mueller’s candid remarks underline Google’s long-standing position that disavowing links is largely unnecessary unless prompted by a manual action from Google.

Why SEO Professionals Are Talking About This

The controversy surrounding toxic link disavowal stems from the pushback against SEO tools that categorize certain backlinks as harmful to a website’s ranking. 

In his post, Mueller responded to Chris Garett, who questioned the lack of evidence behind these tools’ recommendations. 

Mueller not only reiterated Google’s stance but also hinted at the eventual obsolescence of the disavow tool itself, noting that Bing had already abandoned its version in September 2023.

#seo folks

I am seeing a bunch more people advocating disavowing toxic links, but I still don’t see the tools giving me much in the way of persuasive argument.

SEMRush tells me anything on blogspot or with a link to our book as toxic (the word ‘money’ in the anchor).

What do you think?

[image or embed]

— Chris Garrett (@chrisg.com) December 16, 2024 at 5:51 PM

Tools like SEMRush and others often flag links hosted on platforms like Blogspot or with specific anchors as toxic, yet Mueller emphasized that these classifications don’t hold weight in Google’s ranking algorithm. 

His response reignited discussions on whether SEOs are being misled into spending unnecessary resources on this practice.

Decoding Google’s Viewpoint

Google has consistently discouraged the widespread use of the disavow tool, asserting that their systems are sophisticated enough to ignore low-quality links. 

The tool, launched in 2012, was intended as a last resort for sites that had received manual penalties for link schemes. Over time, many SEOs adopted it as a proactive measure despite Google’s repeated advice against doing so without concrete reasons.

I’m still shocked at how many seos regularly disavow links. Why? Unless you spammed them or have a manual action you’re probably doing more harm than good.

— Ryan Jones (@RyanJones) January 31, 2023

The core of Mueller’s argument is that Google’s algorithms automatically identify and disregard spammy links, making disavowal redundant in most cases. By continuing to use this outdated approach, businesses risk wasting valuable time and money.

Is This the End of the Disavow Era?

Google’s stance signals a significant shift in SEO practices. Last year, Google removed Bing’s disavow tool, which could foreshadow similar moves. 

If Google does phase out the tool, it will solidify the company’s confidence in its link evaluation algorithms. 

This could also force SEOs to reconsider their reliance on automated toxic link analyses and focus on strategies that genuinely impact rankings.

How Does This Impact SEO Practices?

Mueller’s statement carries significant implications for businesses and SEOs alike:

Focus on Quality Content: Time spent disavowing links could be better allocated to creating valuable content that organically attracts high-quality backlinks.

Reassess Tools: Companies relying on toxic link reports from SEO tools should critically evaluate the validity of these assessments.

Cost Savings: Eliminating disavowal practices could save businesses from unnecessary expenditures.

Trust Google’s Algorithms: SEOs might need to place greater trust in Google’s ability to filter out bad links as the manual intervention era fades.

What Does the Future Hold?

The eventual removal of the disavow tool seems inevitable, reflecting Google’s commitment to streamlining its ecosystem. 

Businesses must adapt by shifting their focus to white-hat SEO practices. 

Building relationships, generating engaging content, and fostering organic links are the cornerstones of modern SEO. 

This evolution will also encourage transparency in the SEO tools market, as users demand tools that provide actionable, evidence-based insights.

Practical Tips for SEOs and Businesses

Here’s how you can make the most of your SEO efforts in light of Google’s evolving stance on toxic links:

Evaluate Tools: Scrutinize the recommendations from SEO tools and ensure they align with Google’s guidelines.

Focus Resources Wisely: Invest in creating high-quality content and improving user experience.

Stay Informed: Monitor Google’s updates to adapt your SEO strategies accordingly.

Audit Backlinks Judiciously: Reserve disavowal efforts for situations involving manual penalties or undeniable evidence of harmful links.

Key Takeaways

• Google discourages widespread disavowal of toxic links, deeming it unnecessary.
• Tools flagging links as toxic often lack persuasive evidence.
• Businesses should focus on value-driven SEO tactics, not redundant practices.
• The disavow tool’s future is uncertain, hinting at its potential phase-out.
• SEOs must prioritize strategies aligned with evolving algorithmic sophistication.