Food publisher Inspired Taste has publicly accused AI-powered platforms of plagiarizing its original recipes, warning readers that its work is being repackaged without permission and redistributed across Google Search and other platforms.
In a strongly worded statement shared on X, the brand said it has no meaningful way to opt out of this use, calling the trend unsustainable and damaging for creators.
The post is growing frustration among publishers who say AI-generated content is copying, remixing, and rebranding original work at scale.
We have a bit of a rant. We are simply fed up seeing our recipes, as well as other trusted recipes from other sites, plagiarized in the form of branded AI Frankenstein recipes that are flooding Google search and other platforms. This has to stop! We are starting to warn all of… pic.twitter.com/5x5rVmvRFL
— Inspired Taste (@inspiredtaste) December 5, 2025
What Did Inspired Taste Say About AI Recipe Plagiarism?
The statement came directly from Inspired Taste, a long-established recipe and cooking website known for original, tested recipes.
In its public post, the brand said it was “fed up” with seeing its recipes and those from other trusted publishers reappearing as what it described as “branded AI Frankenstein recipes.”
According to Inspired Taste, these AI-generated versions are flooding search results, often appearing under unfamiliar brand names while closely mirroring the structure, ingredients and steps of the original recipes.
The publisher focused that it never granted permission for this reuse and that there is no practical mechanism to prevent it.
“This has to stop,” the post concluded, signaling a breaking point for creators who feel their intellectual property is being exploited without recourse.
We have a bit of a rant. We are simply fed up seeing our recipes, as well as other trusted recipes from other sites, plagiarized in the form of branded AI Frankenstein recipes that are flooding Google search and other platforms. This has to stop! We are starting to warn all of… pic.twitter.com/5x5rVmvRFL
— Inspired Taste (@inspiredtaste) December 5, 2025
Why Is Recipe Content Especially Vulnerable to AI Scraping?
Recipe content is uniquely exposed to AI-driven reuse.
Recipes are highly structured, instructional and easy for large language models to summarize or rephrase while preserving functional equivalence.
That makes them ideal targets for automated content generation.
For food publishers, the value of a recipe lies not just in the list of ingredients, but in the testing, refinement and trust built with readers over time.
When AI systems repackage that work into new branded outputs, they effectively strip away attribution while retaining utility.
Inspired Taste’s frustration reflects a broader concern that AI-generated recipes often rely on original creators’ labor without contributing traffic, credit or compensation.
How Are “AI Frankenstein Recipes” Showing Up in Search?
The publisher’s reference to “Frankenstein recipes” points to a growing pattern: AI-generated pages that stitch together elements from multiple trusted sources, rewording them just enough to appear unique.
These pages often:
- Mimic the structure and flow of well-known recipes
- Substitute minor ingredient phrasing without changing substance
- Present themselves as original brands despite no testing or expertise
Because they are optimized at scale, such pages can overwhelm search results, pushing original publishers further down the page even when the underlying knowledge originated with them.
Why Is This a Search and SEO Problem, Not Just a Content Issue?
Inspired Taste’s complaint highlights a systemic issue in how search platforms surface content.
When AI-generated recipes dominate results, search engines effectively reward derivative content over original work.
That undermines the incentive for publishers to invest in testing, photography and editorial quality.
From an SEO perspective, this creates a paradox.
Original creators follow best practices, demonstrate expertise, and build trust over years, yet lose visibility to automated replicas that scale faster and cost less to produce.
Do Publishers Have Any Way to Opt Out of AI Reuse?
According to Inspired Taste, the answer today is effectively no.
While publishers can block crawlers or restrict certain bots, doing so often removes them entirely from search visibility.
There is no widely adopted mechanism that allows creators to say “index my content but don’t reuse it for AI-generated derivatives.”
This lack of control is at the heart of the outrage.
Publishers are being forced into an all-or-nothing choice between visibility and protection, an unsustainable tradeoff for many independent sites.
Why Are Food and Recipe Sites Speaking Out Now?
Food publishers have long relied on organic search as a primary traffic driver.
Recent shifts like AI Overviews, zero-click searches and AI-generated content saturation have eroded that model.
Inspired Taste’s public warning to readers suggests a defensive move: reasserting authenticity and drawing a clear line between original work and AI-generated imitations.
The post also tagged prominent SEO analysts and industry figures, signaling that this is not an isolated complaint but part of a broader industry conversation about AI, attribution, and fairness.
Could This Trigger Broader Action From Publishers?
Public call-outs like this often mark the beginning of collective pressure.
As more publishers speak openly about AI reuse, platforms may face demands for clearer attribution, opt-out mechanisms or compensation models.
Inspired Taste’s post adds emotional urgency to what has often been discussed in technical or legal terms.
By framing the issue as plagiarism rather than innovation, it reframes the debate around creator rights.
Final Takeaway
Inspired Taste’s outburst is a signal that patience is wearing thin. Recipe publishers, long dependent on search visibility, are confronting a reality where AI-generated imitations dilute their work and livelihoods.
The controversy underscores a growing tension at the heart of modern search: how to balance AI-powered convenience with respect for original creators.
Until that balance is addressed, warnings like this are likely to grow louder and more frequent.
Dipti Arora
AuthorDipti Arora is a Senior Content Writer with over seven years of experience creating impactful content across Digital Marketing, SEO, technology, and business domains. She has a strong background in managing news verticals and delivering editorial excellence. Dipti has contributed to leading publications such as The Times of India and CEO News, where her research-driven storytelling and ability to simplify complex subjects have consistently stood out. She is passionate about crafting content that informs, engages, and drives meaningful results.
